🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."